Photo 23 Feb 1 note No doubt a slim volume. If the blurb is representative of the content, I would question exactly how Ph. his D. is. 1. There hasn’t been a single fossil found yet that contradicts evolution. In other words, the entire fossil record supports evolution. The Wikipedia list of transitional fossils is a constantly-updated litany of reasons why creationists are wrong. 2. A “lack of records” cannot possibly demonstrate anything.

No doubt a slim volume. If the blurb is representative of the content, I would question exactly how Ph. his D. is.

1. There hasn’t been a single fossil found yet that contradicts evolution. In other words, the entire fossil record supports evolution. The Wikipedia list of transitional fossils is a constantly-updated litany of reasons why creationists are wrong.

2. A “lack of records” cannot possibly demonstrate anything.

  1. atheistcartoons posted this

A joint venture of solo1y and PostSatire